diff options
| author | thing1 <thing1@seacrossedlovers.xyz> | 2024-09-24 10:37:54 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | thing1 <thing1@seacrossedlovers.xyz> | 2024-09-24 10:37:54 +0100 |
| commit | 35dd2471ea9615d0fd69a43075ee8b01470ec73c (patch) | |
| tree | 24e6f78629618f64233fa3dc160987a19457cdca /notes/reasearch/1.links.org | |
| parent | a6a0dffa6945c3b79b42d6e0cd3382f97242814e (diff) | |
added a couple more links, notably on 'the open letter to hobyists' and 'the gnu manifesto'
Diffstat (limited to 'notes/reasearch/1.links.org')
| -rw-r--r-- | notes/reasearch/1.links.org | 14 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/notes/reasearch/1.links.org b/notes/reasearch/1.links.org index 3a26ef5..3d77e3d 100644 --- a/notes/reasearch/1.links.org +++ b/notes/reasearch/1.links.org @@ -1,8 +1,10 @@ * links (17/09/24) (19/09/24) ** papers and people (19/09/24) -*** very helpful (19/09/24) +*** very helpful (19/09/24) (24/09/24) - a colection of all or richard stallmans paper's [https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fsfs/rms-essays.pdf] (first published in 2002, updated 2004) - a paper written by Nicolas Jullien (prof. at IMT) comparing and contrasting open vs proprietary software [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2559454_Open-Source_vs_Proprietary_Software] + - the gnu manifesto [https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html] the start of the moddern free software movement, the first time the terms was + properly used *** rather helpful (19/09/24) - lawrence lessig is a researcher of law and political acitavist who has been tied with open/free software for a long time, he is the editor of the stallman papers [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Lessig] @@ -48,3 +50,13 @@ - google corporate license [https://cla.developers.google.com/about/google-corporate] *** no license - some projects are under no license which is a similar effect to open source licences + +** news storys and intresting events + - an open letter to hobbyist [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Open_Letter_to_Hobbyists], this + letter from bill gates to open source software developers, complain in simple terms. + the letter was mostly in reference to people pirating copys of basic + it claims that no one has the time to develope software and distribute for free, and anyone + who isnt paying for their software is a theif. the reaction of this was software went to + a new licensing format (which we still use today) of pre paid licenses when the hardware + is brought. although never directly said, in the marketing for the apple 1, it was a key + selling point, that its version of basic was free. |