summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--notes/reasearch/1.links.org14
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/notes/reasearch/1.links.org b/notes/reasearch/1.links.org
index 3a26ef5..3d77e3d 100644
--- a/notes/reasearch/1.links.org
+++ b/notes/reasearch/1.links.org
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
* links (17/09/24) (19/09/24)
** papers and people (19/09/24)
-*** very helpful (19/09/24)
+*** very helpful (19/09/24) (24/09/24)
- a colection of all or richard stallmans paper's [https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fsfs/rms-essays.pdf] (first published in 2002, updated 2004)
- a paper written by Nicolas Jullien (prof. at IMT) comparing and contrasting open vs proprietary software [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2559454_Open-Source_vs_Proprietary_Software]
+ - the gnu manifesto [https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html] the start of the moddern free software movement, the first time the terms was
+ properly used
*** rather helpful (19/09/24)
- lawrence lessig is a researcher of law and political acitavist who has been tied with open/free software
for a long time, he is the editor of the stallman papers [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Lessig]
@@ -48,3 +50,13 @@
- google corporate license [https://cla.developers.google.com/about/google-corporate]
*** no license
- some projects are under no license which is a similar effect to open source licences
+
+** news storys and intresting events
+ - an open letter to hobbyist [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Open_Letter_to_Hobbyists], this
+ letter from bill gates to open source software developers, complain in simple terms.
+ the letter was mostly in reference to people pirating copys of basic
+ it claims that no one has the time to develope software and distribute for free, and anyone
+ who isnt paying for their software is a theif. the reaction of this was software went to
+ a new licensing format (which we still use today) of pre paid licenses when the hardware
+ is brought. although never directly said, in the marketing for the apple 1, it was a key
+ selling point, that its version of basic was free.