diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | comp/lucas-standen-NEA/writeup/questions-for-amy.ms | 28 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/comp/lucas-standen-NEA/writeup/questions-for-amy.ms b/comp/lucas-standen-NEA/writeup/questions-for-amy.ms index 71b6df2..a6b3efd 100644 --- a/comp/lucas-standen-NEA/writeup/questions-for-amy.ms +++ b/comp/lucas-standen-NEA/writeup/questions-for-amy.ms @@ -1,42 +1,42 @@ .TL -Questions for the end user (amy C) +Questions for the end user (Amy C) .NH 1 What do you find the most important in a languge? (eg: speed, readablity) .PP -<ans 1> +Speed, readability, debugging ease and disk space efficiency. .NH 1 -What tools are important for a languge to have? (eg: pkg-manger, ide intergration) +What tools are important for a language to have? (eg: pkg-manager, ide integration) .PP -<ans 2> +IDE integration (things like tab complete and debugging tools), a package manager, and the ability to interact with the user through the command line easily. .NH 1 What features do you like from other languages (eg: zigs memory managment, haskells terse syntax) .PP -<ans 3> +The ability to pass the memory reference of an object or function and a collection of built-in or standard functions like "print", "split", or "sort" .NH 1 What do you want to program in this language (eg: websites, low level systems) .PP -<ans 4> +Lightweight command line tools and web backends. .NH 1 Do you intend to use graphics in the programs you write? .PP -<ans 5> +No .NH 1 -Would you prefer a languge that focus's on ease of use, or power of the code? +Would you prefer a languge that focuses on ease of use, or power of the code? .PP -<ans 6> +I like a good balance between the two. .NH 1 What were your last 3 projects? (could they have been writen in zippy?) .PP -<ans 7> +A website, a small command-line tool and a midi keyboard (program runs on a Raspberry Pi Pico) .NH 1 How many languages would you use on a single project? (could zippy be used in your codebase?) .PP -<ans 8> +I try to use as little languages in a project as possible, so likely not in an existing project. .NH Do you care for low level control, or would you prefer high level abstractions? .PP -<ans 9> +I think low-level control is very important, but high-level abstractions are convenient, so a good balance between the two is best. .NH 1 -Would you be happy to develope libarys for things that aren't already implemented (eg: a sql lib) +Would you be happy to develop libaries for things that aren't already implemented (eg: an sql lib) .PP -<ans 10> +Potentially if it is simple enough to implement new things. |